Ohio Correctional Officer Practice Exam

In the Farmer vs. Brennan (1994) ruling, what must correction officials be aware of to avoid a claim of deliberate indifference?

1. A minor risk of injury to inmates

2. A substantial risk of serious harm

3. A minor inconvenience to prison routines

4. A negligible threat to facility security

The correct answer is: A substantial risk of serious harm

In the Farmer vs. Brennan (1994) ruling, correction officials must be aware of a substantial risk of serious harm to inmates to avoid a claim of deliberate indifference. This landmark Supreme Court case established that prison officials have a duty to protect inmates from serious harm, which includes recognizing and addressing situations that present a significant risk to their safety and well-being. Deliberate indifference is determined by whether officials ignored or disregarded this substantial risk. The ruling clarified that it is not enough for prison officials to only address minor or negligible risks; they must be proactive in safeguarding inmates when there is clear evidence that they face serious harm. By prioritizing substantial risks, the court aimed to ensure that inmate safety is taken seriously and that officials do not neglect their responsibility. Thus, understanding the severe nature of threats allows correctional staff to create a safer environment for all inmates.